WHAT IS "SOCIAL WELFARE"...

TEABAGGERS SAY THEY ARE A SOCIAL WELFARE ORGANIZATION...

BUT THE DEFINITION OF SOCIAL WELFARE NEEDS TO BE REFINED...  

MANY LIBERAL GROUPS ARE DIRECTLY INVOLVED IN SOCIAL WELFARE PROGRAMS LIKE HELPING THE POOR ...SO THEY ARE A CLEAR CASE OF SOCIAL WELFARE...

BUT REPUBLICANS AND THEIR TEABAGGERS ARE ON THE OPPOSITE SIDE OF SOCIAL WELFARE... THEY ARE OFTEN HELPING THE RICH... DO THE RICH NEED SOCIAL WELFARE TAX EXEMPT STATUS...?

IN MANY CASES THE TEABAGGERS AND THEIR RICH PATRONS WANT TO ABOLISH SOCIAL WELFARE PROGRAMS...

WAS THAT THE INTENT OF THE LAWS EXEMPTION...?  TO HELP THE RICH BECOME RICHER... ?  IF SO...FINE...LIVE WITH IT...

DO THE ROMNEYS AND ADLEMANS OF THE WORLD NEED SOCIAL WELFARE TAX EXEMPTIONS...TO PUSH THEIR AGENDAS...??

IF SO THE LAW NEEDS TO BE READ AS IT WAS INTENDED ON PASSAGE...OR A NEW DEFINITION OF "SOCIAL WELFARE" NEEDS TO BE ENACTED...

BEING FOR MORE FOOD STAMPS IS CLEARLY A SOCIAL WELFARE POSITION...

DOES BEING AGAINST FOOD STAMPS NEED TO BE REDEFINED...IS THAT TOO IS A "SOCIAL WELFARE" POSITION...?  

WE NEED CLEARER DEFINTIONS TO AVOID THINGS LIKE THE CURRENT "SCANDAL" AT THE IRS...!

SINCE THE HATE MEDIA HAS "REDEFINED" SOCIAL WELFARE TO INCLUDE HATE GROUPS AND PEOPLE WHO ARE FOR MORE POVERTY IN SOCIETY..?

WE NEED BETTER DEFINITIONS IN THAT LAW.