Is the fix in on the election? I think it is.
By running as Bush-Lite, Kerry has made it almost impossible for he
and Edwards to win.
I mean, why vote for Bush-Lite when you can get the real thing?
It is also becoming clear that the media is setting Kerry up to
be "Gored," just like Al was in 2000.
NOTHING KERRY DOES IS EVER RIGHT. AND, EVERYTHING DUBYA DOES IS
JUST FINE.
We see this again and again. When Edwards was picked as VP, within
hours the pundits were proclaiming "no bounce" for Kerry.
When the convention was held, we were constantly reminded that Kerry
was getting "no bounce" from the nomination. And, the major media
pundits were almost uniformly negative about anything and everything
concerning the convention and the nominiation.
CLEARLY, THE FIX IS IN ON THE ELECTION, JUST LIKE IT WAS IN 2000!
MY HUNCH IS THAT THE "POLLING" WILL SHOW DUBYA 10 POINTS UP ON KERRY
AFTER THE REPUBLICAN CONVENTION.
IN TRUTH, I DON'T THINK THAT KERRY EVEN WANTS TO WIN THIS ELECTION.
Or, if he does he doesn't act like it. His speaking is uniformly
dry and uninspired. And, considering the horrid time Dubya has been
having Kerry just can't seem to close the deal.
But this is really not surpising. Does anyone really believe that
the US Government is going to be handed over to the "little
people?" The working classes? Of course not.
The US did not get into it's current mess, because it was responding
to the needs of the working class!
IT IS OBVIOUS THAT THE PLUTOCRACY ON WALL STREET AND MAIN STREET,
THE RELIGIOUS RIGHT AND THE ISRAELI LOBBY ARE STILL FIRMLY IN
CONTROL OF POWER IN THE US, AND THAT IS NOT GOING TO CHANGE SOON.
AND SURELY NOT IN THIS ELECTION.
On the Sunday talks, Safire was full of conservative blather, while
Ms Dowd looked like the "cat got her tongue" did you notice? It
appears that Ms Dowd has got her instructions, just as Tom Friedman
did when he decided to "take a walk" for the duration of the
election cycle, supposedly, to finish his book.
See the point? The liberal pundits are folding their tents "for
some reason!"
BUSH HAS WON RE-ELECTION; FOR BETTER OR WORSE. Probably worse, much
worse.
Frankly, I am not even going to vote in November, and I must say I
did not vote in 2000 either. Voting is an act of foolish
desperation really. These elections are decided much higher up than
at the ballot box. It is childish and naive to think otherwise.
WHILE I PERSONALLY WILL NOT VOTE;
I CAN NOT GIVE ADVISE TO OTHER PEOPLE ON WHAT THEY SHOULD DO.
BUT, IF I ABSOLUTELY WAS FORCED TO VOTE.
THAT IS TO PICK ONE CANDIDATE FROM THE PACK:
I WOULD VOTE FOR RALPH NADER.
BECAUSE IT'S OVER! BUSH HAS WON A SECOND TERM!
Postscript: But stay tuned! That means plenty of Gloom and Doom
for FOUR MORE YEARS!
