THE NEED FOR NATO TO EXIST POST COLD WAR IS NOT CLEAR...
IT SEEMS DESIGNED TO PROVOKE RUSSIA...AND KEEP THE RUSSIANS FROM INTEGRATING WITH EUROPE ECONOMICALLY AND CULTURALLY...
THE NOTION THAT BOUTIQUE STATES LIKE ALBANIA AND GEORGIA ARE MORE IMPORTANT TO THE FUTURE OF EUROPE THAN RUSSIA IS CLEAR EVIDENCE THAT NATO EXISTS ONLY TO PROVOKE RUSSIA AND CONTINUE THE COLD WAR GEOPOLITICS AT ALL COSTS...
FORTUNATELY, GERMANY AND OTHERS ARE MAKING SIDE DEALS WITH RUSSIA...BECAUSE THE GERMANS REALIZE THAT A EURO-RUSSIAN ALLIANCE ECONOMICALLY AND POLITICALLY WOULD BE A MAJOR BENEFIT TO THEIR RESPECTIVE ECONOMIES AND COULD SHIFT THE BALANCE OF POWER AWAY FROM THE NOW MORIBUND ANGLO-EUROPEAN ALLIANCES OF THE 20TH CENTURY...
UKRAINE IS DIVIDED ON NATO...AND IT'S MOTIVES ARE QUESTIONABLE....FEW IN UKRAINE ACTUALLY BELIEVE THAT THEY CAN CUT THEIR CULTURAL AND HISTORIC TIES WITH RUSSIA, ORTHODOXY AND EASTERN SLAVIC CULTURE...
BOTH UKRAINE, GEORGIA AND ALBANIA ARE BEYOND THE PALE OF NATO PROTECTION IN ANY EVENT... WHAT NEXT, THE JIHADI TERROR STATE OF KOSOVO INTO NATO...!
AND THIS NOTION THAT THESE COUNTRIES ARE MORE IMPORTANT TO THE EUROPEAN FUTURE AND ECONOMY...THAN RUSSIAN INTEGRATION...IS COMPLETELY NUTS.
IT IS REALLY UNCLEAR AT THIS POINT WHO OR WHAT NATO WILL BE PROTECTING IN THE COMING YEARS...
RIGHT NOW NATO SEEMS DETERMINED TO PROTECT IT'S RIGHT TO EXIST...AND TO KEEP THE COLD WAR TENSIONS ALIVE...
BUT THE BENEFICIAL ECONOMIC OUTCOMES OF A EURO-RUSSIAN INTEGRATION WILL WIN OUT EVENTUALLY...
