A VOTE FOR ROMNEY IS AN IRRATIONAL VOTE...

ROMNEY OFFERS NOTHING TO THE PEOPLE WHO VOTE FOR HIM...

A VOTE FOR ROMNEY IS ESSENTIALLY AN IRRATIONAL VOTE... A VOTE THAT SAYS : "NOT OBAMA"

NO ONE KNOWS WHO ROMNEY IS...OR WHAT HE WILL SUPPORT AS PRESIDENT ELECT...  

WHO WILL SHOW UP?  ...MODERATE MITT...FLIP FLOPPER MITT...CONSERVATIVE MITT..."I'M FOR WHAT YOU'RE FOR" MITT...?

ITS VERY POSSIBLE THAT ROMNEY COULD GOVERN WITH THE DEMOCRATS TO STOP THE LOOTING AND PROTECT THE MIDDLE CLASS...THE SO CALLED MODERATE MITT, AS WHEN GOVERNOR OF MASS...

THIS IS THE NOTION THAT THE DES MOINES REGISTER WENT WITH...AS AN ACT OF FAITH...


THIS WOULD ANGER MANY RADICAL REPUBLICANS...FOR WHOM ANY "COMPROMISE" IS NOT ALLOWED... AND NO POLICY DEMOCRATS SUPPORT CAN EVER BE AGREED TO...

BUT THE CONSERVATIVE WING WHICH IS MORE PRO-LOOTING AND TAX CUTS...WOULD LIKELY DOMINATE MITT...AT LEAST AT FIRST...

WHEN DUBYA WAS REELECTED HE IMMEDIATELY DECIDED HE HAD A "MANDATE TO PRIVATIZE SOCIAL SECURITY"...  BUT THAT WAS STRUCK DOWN SO FAST... BUSH NEVER MENTIONED IT AGAIN...

SO ROMNEY WILL "GROW" INTO THE PRESIDENCY... 

HE WILL NOT BE ABLE TO LOOT OR CUT TAXES ON THE RICH...AS REAL REPUBLICANS WANT...  

AND HE WILL NOT BE ABLE TO CUT THE SOCIAL SAFETY NET ON WHICH MANY WORKING CLASS WHITE REPUBLICANS RELY...

THE DEFICIT THAT WAS ACCUMULATED TO STOP THE BUSH DEPRESSION WILL ALSO PREVENT ROMNEY FROM ADDING TO THE DEFICITS IN WAYS THAT REPUBLICANS USUALLY DO...WITH UNFUNDED TAX CUTS AND WAR SPENDING...

THIS COULD LEAD TO THE ODD SITUATION THE DAY AFTER MITT'S ELECTION...

IF HE GOES BEFORE THE PUBLIC AS PRESIDENT ELECT...AND SAYS...

"OK, NOW WHAT?"