Friday, June 18, 2004

WAS FLIGHT 93 SHOT DOWN?

The 911 Commission's grim details of 911 renewed one of my personal crackpot notions that Fight 93 was, in fact, shot down. And, that the shoot down is being "covered up" by Washington.

Consider:

Of all of the planes involved in 911, the details on Flight 93 are always kept oddly hush-hush.

The families were "allowed" to hear the final black box tapes, but only if they promised not to talk about it afterward.

Furthermore, why did flight 93 fly ALL THE WAY to Cleveland in a
nearly STRAIGHT LINE;

ONLY TO "CRASH" AFTER IT ATTEMPTED TO TURN EASTWARD TOWARD
WASHINGTON!!

Was Flight 93 engaged or tailed by the military jets?

And, was it forced to fly a long distance AWAY FROM IT'S INTENDED
TARGET; and then and only then, shot down, AFTER it turned to the
east? Compare the flight paths of all the 911 planes to see this
oddity.

Additionally, the so-called rushing of the cockpit by passengers,
just does not have the ring of truth to it. Is that really how
people would react: IF THEY WERE UNSURE ABOUT WHAT WAS REALLY
HAPPENING? As were we all.

This notion that the passengers deliberately crashed the plane is
just a little bit too incredible.

And, the more we know about Mr. Cheney, and his orders to shoot down planes as needed;

The more we see that a shoot down was clearly NOT out of the question with Flight 93.

Indeed, a shoot down was the "next step," BUT FOR the
supposedly "heroic actions" of the passengers.

In other words, Flight 93 was doomed, one way or other, so why not go with the "Heroic Passengers Scenario."

Fight 93 was NEVER going to make it to Washington. And, indeed, once it began to execute it's fatal eastward turn---it was all over for Flight 93.

Also, there has been great care to avoid any eye witnesses accounts, and the crash site was off limits to the media, in a very odd way afterwards.

Finally, the BBC initially reported that the plane fell from the sky in two parts! Seperated by some distance. This claim was later dropped, or at least never mentioned again by the BBC.

Lastly, there is a certain OFFICIAL STRANGENESS when the subject of Flight 93 is mentioned or discussed...............

Why?

Perhaps it's only my crackpot notion,....but think about.....?

Something doesn't quite add up about the real fate of Flight 93.